New Eyes
Buys a basic pair of prescription eyeglasses for people who cannot afford them and already have a current prescription.
Best for
Someone who has had an eye exam, has the prescription in hand, and cannot pay for the glasses.
Why Kave includes this
This solves the specific gap that strands people between an exam and actually seeing: free exams are relatively easy to find, and free glasses are not. Kave pairs it with EyeCare America so a user can get the exam and the glasses from two programs that each do one thing well.
- Expected cost
- Glasses are purchased for the applicant through a participating provider. No cost to the recipient.
- Insurance requirement
- For people without vision coverage or means to pay.
- Who qualifies
- Income-based, with an application usually submitted through a social worker, clinic, or agency. Requires a current eyeglass prescription.
- Where it is available
- Nationwide (United States)
- How you use it
- Online or by phone
- Languages
- English and Spanish
Limitations Kave wants you to know about
- You must already have a current prescription — this program does not provide eye exams.
- Covers basic single-vision or bifocal lenses; specialist lenses are generally excluded.
- Applications usually go through a caseworker or agency rather than direct from the individual.
- Does not cover contact lenses, sunglasses, or repairs.
Verification
Compiled by Kave on July 1, 2026 and link-checked. Not yet independently verified. Kave assembled this from the organisation’s own published material and confirmed the links resolve. No reviewer has confirmed the eligibility details against the source, so check them on the official site before you rely on them.
- Compiled
- July 1, 2026 (28 days ago)
- Next scheduled review
- September 29, 2026
- Reviewed by
- Not yet reviewed
Sources used
- New Eyes — read July 1, 2026
Kave quality score
83/100
Kave lists resources scoring 80 or above that also clear all four mandatory gates.
- Patient impact20.5/25
- Affordability or financial value19.2/20
- Transparency12.9/15
- Accessibility10.8/15
- Ease of use6.6/10
- Geographic reach4.6/5
- Institutional credibility4.4/5
- Privacy and data practices4.3/5
Geographic reach is deliberately worth only five points, so a strong local resource is not pushed out by a weak national one. Read the methodology.